← All battles

22–25 November 1915 · World War I

Battle of Ctesiphon (1915)

Between 22 and 25 November 1915 Townshend's mostly Indian 6th (Poona) Division stormed the Ottoman lines by the Arch of Ctesiphon but was fought to a standstill, and fell back to Kut. That retreat ended the first British drive on Baghdad and led to the siege of Kut.

draft This page has not been through review yet.

The Battle of Ctesiphon, 22–24 November 1915: Map 9 of the British official history (Moberly, 1924).
The Battle of Ctesiphon, 22–24 November 1915: Map 9 of the British official history (Moberly, 1924). Unknown author Unknown author · Public domain

Background

Indian Expeditionary Force D landed at the head of the Persian Gulf in November 1914, chiefly to protect the oil refinery at Abadan. Through 1915 it pushed up the rivers, and on 28 September Major-General Charles Townshend's 6th (Poona) Division beat Nur-ud-Din's army at Kut al Amara. The pursuit halted at Aziziya on 5 October.

The question then was Baghdad. General Sir John Nixon, commanding in Mesopotamia, urged an advance from 3 October; Townshend preferred to consolidate at Kut. In London the War Office, the Admiralty and a Cabinet committee weighed occupation against a raid. The case for going on was that Baghdad would deny the Turks their base, raise British prestige, offset failure at the Dardanelles and hamper German schemes in Persia and Afghanistan. Nixon wired that he was confident he could beat Nur-ud-Din and occupy Baghdad with the force he had. On 23 October the Cabinet authorised the advance, and two Indian divisions from France were promised, though they could not arrive for weeks.

The British advance from Aziziya began on 11 November and reached Lajj, about twelve miles short of the Ottoman position, on the 19th. Nur-ud-Din had used the seven-week pause to train his troops and dig. Nixon put the Turks at about 13,000 regular infantry with 38 guns and dismissed reports of large reinforcements. In fact the 51st Division had arrived from the north. On 21 November Major Reilly flew over the Turkish rear, saw the new camp and was shot down and captured; the Turkish account says his map showed the 51st Division. Nobody on the British side saw it.

The armies

Townshend had 13,756 combatants, 30 guns and 46 machine guns, about four-fifths of them Indian: three British infantry battalions (2nd Dorsets, 2nd Norfolks, 1st Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry) served beside Punjabi, Mahratta, Rajput and Gurkha battalions, the 6th Cavalry Brigade and 'S' Battery RHA. He split them into four columns and kept no reserve: Column A (Delamain, 3,650 rifles) for the decisive blow; Column B (Hamilton, 2,693) for the turning attack; Column C (Hoghton, 3,154) to pin the front; and Melliss's Flying Column of cavalry, guns, armoured cars and the 76th Punjabis to swing round the open flank. Gunboats and 4.7-inch guns in horse boats on the river were to support him, and only two aircraft were fit to fly.

Nur-ud-Din had four divisions. The 35th and 38th were largely Arab, with poor morale by the Turkish account; the 45th was newly raised but contained good material; the 51st, Anatolian Turks, had a fine fighting reputation and formed his general reserve at Qusaiba. Field Marshal von der Goltz had been appointed to command a new Sixth Army but was still on his way. The first line ran over six miles on the left bank: fifteen low-sited, wired redoubts joined by trench, with two strong redoubts on mounds at the northern end that Townshend called 'Vital Point' ('V.P.'). A weaker second line lay two to three miles behind, and a third on the Diyala.

The battle

Night march (21–22 November). Column C marched in the afternoon to a point north-east of Bustan; Columns A, B and the Flying Column left Lajj at about 19:30 and filed north along an old canal bank, halting between midnight and 03:00 around the open Turkish left. The night was bitterly cold. At dawn mist hid the river and the southern trenches.

Opening moves (22 November, 06:00–09:00). Hoghton's Column C felt forward towards the Arch from about 06:00, and the flotilla opened fire at 07:00, but Turkish heavy guns on the right bank kept the gunboats from rounding the bend at Bustan all day. With no sound from Hoghton, Townshend let Hamilton and Melliss start the turning attack early, at about 08:30. Nur-ud-Din sent most of the 45th Division's reserve and five battalions of the 51st, with the Iraq Cavalry Brigade, to meet them. Seeing what looked like a Turkish retreat, Delamain asked to advance, and Column A went for V.P. just before 09:00.

Vital Point (09:00–11:30). Led by Climo's 30th Brigade, the Indian infantry crossed some 5,000 yards of open plain in artillery formation, extended at 1,000 yards and went on by rushes without firing, under cover of their guns and machine guns. Held up by wire forty yards short, they worked through it and took V.P. shortly after 10:00; the 142nd Regiment broke. Climo pushed on west, taking eight abandoned Turkish guns by about 11:30. Meanwhile Hamilton's and Melliss's columns had been stopped by 10:00 by the 45th and 51st Divisions, the 76th Punjabis digging in with heavy losses. Townshend rode to V.P. and ordered Hoghton to swing his brigade north across the Turkish front; it marched across the open under the heaviest fire and lost heavily. With Delamain's last half-battalion it took the redoubt north of Water Redoubt, then Water Redoubt itself, and the 38th Division fled towards Ctesiphon village.

Turkish counter-attack (13:00–17:00). By 13:30 the Turks had lost their whole first line. But Nur-ud-Din sent his last reserve, two battalions of the 51st under Jevad Bey with guns, at V.P. from about 13:00. Climo was wounded, and his mixed firing line, short of British officers, gave way slowly and abandoned the captured guns. Delamain's scratch attack with sixty signallers and orderlies and the 7th Rajputs, and Hoghton's with 250 men from six battalions, got no further. The 51st attacked the 76th Punjabis again at 16:00. Shortly after 17:00 Townshend broke off and concentrated at V.P.; he found Hoghton could muster 700 men, Delamain about 1,000 and Hamilton 800 or 900.

Night battle (23–24 November). Townshend drew in towards the river on the 23rd. Nur-ud-Din, judging the British shaken, ordered a counter-attack for 14:30. It went in late: the XIII Corps broke under fire from Gurkha Mound, a post of about 400 men of the 2/7th Gurkhas and 24th Punjabis with machine guns, which then held off the 35th Division until 04:00. Jevad Bey's battalions made at least six attacks on Water Redoubt from 21:00; the 45th Division pressed V.P. until about 02:00; the 51st lost its way in the dark and never attacked. At 02:00 Nur-ud-Din called it off.

Mutual retreat (24–25 November). Townshend concentrated at High Wall on the 24th and evacuated his wounded. That night a false report of a British flank march led Nur-ud-Din to order a retreat to the Diyala at 04:00 on the 25th; his cavalry reported the British gone from V.P., and at 14:00 he turned the army round. Seeing two large columns coming back, Townshend withdrew to Lajj after dark, starting at about 19:30.

Aftermath

Townshend lost 4,593 men, about a third of his force: 130 of 317 British officers were killed or wounded, the 24th Punjabis, 104th Rifles and 110th Mahrattas each lost about 60%, and four field ambulances equipped for 400 wounded dealt with over 3,500. Evacuating them downstream in crowded, unprepared steamers and barges caused great suffering, and the arrangements were sharply criticised by the commission later appointed to investigate them. The Turks lost 6,188 by Muhammad Amin's count, over 9,500 with deserters, and the 45th Division about 60% of its strength.

The retreat went by Lajj and Aziziya. At Umm at Tubul on 1 December the Turks caught up and were shaken off, and after a final 44-mile march in 36 hours the division reached Kut on 3 December. The Turks invested it on 7 December; von der Goltz reached Nur-ud-Din's headquarters on the 12th. Relief attempts failed, and on 29 April 1916 the garrison surrendered, about 13,000 men going into captivity.

The official historian judged that the dearly bought tactical success became a strategic defeat, and noted how many decisions on both sides rested on false intelligence. The battle is also remembered as proof that the Ottoman army, well entrenched and led, could stop a British-Indian force in open country; Wikipedia credits Nur-ud-Din with doing so without German help.

Wargaming it

Ctesiphon is an attack on a modern entrenched line with no reserve, and a fine test of nerve for both players. At brigade or battalion level, with a turn of an hour or so, the 22nd makes a full day's scenario: four British columns converging over open plain, a wired redoubt line that is invisible until close range, mirage and mist that limit observation, and guns on the river that cannot get round the bend. The British player has to decide when to launch the decisive attack and what to do with no reserve once V.P. falls; the Turkish player has three poor or untried divisions and one good one, and must decide where to commit the 51st and when to throw in the last two battalions.

The night of 23–24 November suits a smaller game: Gurkha Mound against the 35th Division, or Water Redoubt against Jevad Bey's battalions, with ammunition supply, lost direction and command breakdown as the key rules. At operational scale the campaign from Aziziya to Kut is a logistics game: river transport, aircraft for reconnaissance and the wounded.

What ifs: Reilly gets home with his map; Hoghton is held back as a reserve instead of swinging across the front; the 51st finds its way on the night of the 23rd; Townshend stays at Ctesiphon on the 25th, as Nixon wished, while the Turks are still retreating to the Diyala.

Further reading

Public-domain memoirs, letters, histories, novels and poems that name this battle, first those by people alive at the time. Each opens the poem, or the passages about the battle, with a link to the full text at its library.

Memoirs, diaries and letters

Histories

Novels and stories

Maps and pictures

Townshend's advance on Baghdad and retreat to Kut, 1915 (US Military Academy, West Point).
Townshend's advance on Baghdad and retreat to Kut, 1915 (US Military Academy, West Point). This map was created by the Department of Military Art and Engineering, at the U.S. Military Academy (West Point). · Public domain
Major-General Charles Townshend, commander of the 6th (Poona) Division.
Major-General Charles Townshend, commander of the 6th (Poona) Division. It is government property, which original photographer may not be listed. Original photographer unknown. · Public domain
Nur-ud-Din (Nureddin) Pasha, who commanded the Ottoman defence at Ctesiphon.
Nur-ud-Din (Nureddin) Pasha, who commanded the Ottoman defence at Ctesiphon. T.C. · Public domain
'The English attacked by Turkish volunteer cavalry while retreating after their defeat at Ctesiphon': a German illustration by Max Tilke, 1916.
'The English attacked by Turkish volunteer cavalry while retreating after their defeat at Ctesiphon': a German illustration by Max Tilke, 1916. Creator:Karl Max Tilke · Public domain
Donald Maxwell, Ctesiphon, with an RNAS Seaplane (Imperial War Museum).
Donald Maxwell, Ctesiphon, with an RNAS Seaplane (Imperial War Museum). Donald Maxwell · Public domain
Townshend with Halil (Khalil) Pasha after the fall of Kut, April 1916.
Townshend with Halil (Khalil) Pasha after the fall of Kut, April 1916. British Official Photographer · Public domain

In the papers

How American newspapers reported it: 101 pages name “Ctesiphon” between 22 November 1915 and 9 December 1915 in the Library of Congress's Chronicling America. One page from each of these papers, with the lines that name it; the text machine-read from the scan, so expect misreadings.

  • Daily Kennebec journal (Augusta, Me.)25 November 1915

    ... DURING EIGHT FDR ZEUR AND CTESIPHON DECLARES OFFICIAL STATEMENT London. Nov. _4.— After the capture of Ctesiphon. IS miles from Badgad. and the repulse of a Turkish counter attack, the British forces under Gc-n. Townshend were compelled to retire three or four miles in order to secure water, aceordinig to an official com munication issued tonight. The Brit ish losses in the fighting for Zeur, which was taken, and Ctesiphon, are calculated at 2000 men killed and wounded. The communication says• "After a night march from Zeur. which had been occupied on the Ifith Gen. Townshends division attacked the Turkish position at Ctesiphon. IS (miles from Bagdad. on the 22nd. After severe fighting: all day ...

  • St. Croix avis (Christiansted, St. Croix [V.I.])27 November 1915

    ... the Turkish posit on at Ctesiphon, eigh- teen nitles from Bagdad, on the 22ud, aund after severe fighting all day the position was captured w.th about 800 prisoners and large quantities of arms and equipment. Oar losses are caleulated at 2,000 killed and wounded. General Townshend's forece and the General Headquarters bivouacked in the captured positiou that night. On the night of the 23rd heavy counter-attacks by the Turks were repulsed, but on the 24th the want of water necessitated our retirement to the viver, three to four miles below the cuptured position.” A French official communiqué states: “Yesterday morning there was calm ou our whole front except in the Woevre, at Bois Brule, where ...

  • The Barre daily times (Barre, Vt.)27 November 1915

    ... is again in possession of Ctesiphon near Bagdad after its recent temporary with drawal a short distance because of the lack of water, according to advices re ceived in London. The Italian attacks on the defenses of Gorizia continue, Rome reports, the lately won positions being strengthened despite Austrian counter attacks. The situation along the Rumanian fron tier, where a great Russian force is said to have been gathered, is still obscure. A display by the Rumanian public of a feeling in favor of the entente is regard ed in London as an indication the nation is in a position to disregard the demands of the central powers. No definite news has been received of ...

  • New-York tribune (New York [N.Y.])30 November 1915

    ... ON THE TIGRIS Withdraw from Ctesiphon as Enemy Brings Up New Forces. TURK DIVISION LOST IN BATTLE Invader Expected to Resume March on Bagdad as Ihe Season Advances. Landen, Noi _'_. The British i ctory Over 'he lurks at Ctesiphon, near Hag dad, a? reporte,; ha? not. as many persons belies ?i. sealed the fate of Bagdad. An sflcial ;?-il night says that, having suecesi fully coir p's'trd 'he removal of bii wounded an?i prisoners, (lene? stld, the British corn? er, m the ival of Turkish has withdl CS to a pos il .in lower down the Tigril Hiver. I r-.e Turkish of? ficial says that the Brit ich were farced te retreal tas tily, ...

  • Omaha daily bee (Omaha [Neb.])30 November 1915

    ... the activity of our I Ctesiphon Is estimated at four divisions. troops. Along this front the action of our j One of theso is stated by prisoners to j Hrtlllery continues. In the Fellxon valloy .have been practically wiped out This is of tensive Is develooimr reeuUrlv. confirmed by .our own observations, but the approach of Turkish reinforcements as reported. "Genocal Townshend, having success fully completed the removal of h's wounded and prisoners, has withdrawn his force to a position lower down thai liver. Orient is Refused Permit, ta. Make Bk Stock Issue Tor-KKV Kan Nov "9 -Ueorganiza- tlo7of the "Kansa; CMy, Mexico Orient Jlallway company, based upon the isau- onco of $71,000,000 worth of ...

  • Middletown transcript (Middletown, Del.)4 December 1915

    ... After clearing the battlefield at Ctesiphon, near Bagdad, in Mesopo-j tamia, the British have again with drawn to the river. The Turks report, that the British were forced to re- j tire by reason of counter-attacks after suffering very heavy losses. Arti lery J engagements in which the wBrlt sh monitors take a hand, continue on the j Gallipoli Peninsula. The recent successes of the Ali es j in Kamerun are considered likely fore runners of the complete defeat of the Germans there. They are now con centrated at Jaunde and, although well supplied with guns, find it diffi cult, owing to the British blockade of the coast, to get munitions. The Allies forces are ...

  • The Breckenridge news (Cloverport, Ky.)8 December 1915

    ... force which was defeated at Ctesiphon while trying to reach Bagdad continues, and that the British aro retreating in disorder. It also tells of the capture of a tugboat utid a provision and munition ship oa the Ticres. i 55 SB- S5- MS i 5vn 1 II 70 Years Under One Name Market St. Louisville, Kentucky The Christmas Store Books Make Enjoyable Gifts These at 50c Per Copy Laddie Gene Stratton I'orter l'reckles Oenc Stratton i'orter Girl of the I.ltnberlost Gene Stratton I'orter Garden of Lies Justice Mites Format! House of Happiness Kate Langley Iloshcr Heart of the Hills John Fox, Jr. The Harvester Gf ne Stratton I'orter Hollow of Her Hand George ll.ur McCutchcoti ...

  • Wood County reporter (Grand Rapids [i.e. Wisconsin Rapids], Wis.)9 December 1915

    ... forced after a defeat at Ctesiphon is now admitted in London The illustration shows Turkish artillery crossing the famous bridge of boat! at Bagdad, and, on the right. Sir John Nixon, loader of the British Colonials in Mesopotamia. AUBURNDALE Miss Emma Greiner, who spent Thanksgiving with her parents, re turned to her position in Marshfield Monday. Geo. O’Brien teacher of the Dex terville school, came home to spend Thanksgiving with his parents. He re turned to his school duties Saturday morning. Claude Phillins returned Thursday noon from Veedum where he has been .isiting for some time with his parents Glen Fisher, Arthur Panzer and Ida Luepke visited in Marshfield Wednes day between trains. Charles Conrad ...

Sources

  1. s1F. J. Moberly, The Campaign in Mesopotamia 1914–1918, vol. II (HMSO, 1924), chapters XIII–XVI and Appendices XI–XII
  2. s2Battle of Ctesiphon (1915)
  3. s3W. D. Bird, A Chapter of Misfortunes: The Battles of Ctesiphon and of the Dujailah in Mesopotamia (Forster Groom, 1923)
  4. s4The Battle of Ctesiphon, 22–24 November 1915 (The Long, Long Trail, archived 2006)
  5. s5Lieutenant Henry Gallup (National Army Museum, WW1 Remembered: Soldiers' Stories)
  6. s6Edward J. Erickson, Ordered to Die: A History of the Ottoman Army in the First World War (Greenwood, 2001) — not read; cited via s2
  7. s7Edward J. Erickson, Ottoman Army Effectiveness in World War I: A Comparative Study (Routledge, 2007) — not read; cited via s2
  8. s8C. V. F. Townshend, My Campaign in Mesopotamia (Thornton Butterworth, 1920) — not read; quoted via s1
  9. s9Muhammad Amin, The Battle of Suliman Pak (Turkish General Staff; English translation for the Committee of Imperial Defence) — not read; quoted via s1
  10. s10William R. Griffiths, The Great War (West Point Military History Series, Square One, 2003) — not read; cited via s2